What would you do if your neighborhood suddenly came under attack not by terrorists or by crime, but by air so noxious that it damaged your property and endangered your health? While most of us will hopefully never have to confront this question, residents in a west Champaign neighborhood have had to look to each other for an answer.
For most of the time that Dana Ehrhart and his family have lived in their west Champaign neighborhood, the nearby Alloy Casting and Engineering Company has gotten along with its neighbors. But when Alloy changed its manufacturing processes, residents around the plant began to notice a metallic taste in the air, extremely loud noises and an abundance of tiny orange spots covering cars, houses, and other visible surfaces in the area. While such damage to property has been troubling in itself, residents have been doubly concerned about the dangers posed by invisible dust in the air and on the ground. Joyce Haste, who lives near the Alloy plant, wonders, “How much of this dust do you kick up in your face when you mow the lawn?”
In early 2000, the problem became so severe that Alloy’s neighbors could take it no more. They arranged a meeting with company and expressed their concerns over their health and damage to their property. Alloy denied any responsibility and did nothing to correct the problem. Residents then began calling and complaining to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA), which eventually turned the case over to the Attorney General’s office. Last May the Attorney General filed a three-point case against Alloy to the Illinois Pollution Control Board for fugitive dust emissions, noise violations, and for running equipment without the proper permits.
In November the Attorney General’s office filed a motion to amend the complaint against Alloy, with additional charges including unlawful disposal of hazardous waste; failure to meet hazardous waste permitting, reporting, training, and operating requirements; water pollution (unpermitted discharge); and operating without an industrial storm water permit. The amendment was spawned after tests revealed that samples taken from the dust collection bags at the plant exceeded regulatory limits for lead and selenium. High levels of lead can cause serious neurological damage, leading to learning disabilities in children.
While in negotiations with the Attorney General’s office, Alloy Casting continues to publicly deny all liability, and has been trying to bolster its public image by purchasing full-page ads in the News-Gazette which portray Alloy as an exemplary neighbor. The company claims there is no proof that the dust came from the plant, pointing instead to construction and demolition on the former site of a Chinese restaurant on Mattis Avenue, and to the Illinois Concrete Company. Both of these sites, however, lie east of the neighborhood, while prevailing winds blow to the east. Alloy’s explanation also defies logic in that construction and concrete may create dust, but certainly not a hot, metallic dust capable of melting into cars and other metal objects.
Despite Alloy’s denials, the neighborhood is not backing down. Residents have recently hired a lawyer and are filing a lawsuit against the company to pay for the property damage and for any health problems related to the dust. John McMahon, attorney for the residents, says “Alloy can not get away with damaging property and possibly people’s health.”
On December 21st, a hearing was held to determine the validity of a motion to dismiss the personal injury claim the residents have filed against Alloy. The judged dismissed the motion, and for now the residents retain the chance to argue the personal injury claim during trial. Meanwhile, Alloy continues to pursue its own options for dismissing the claim.
Along with taking their complaint to the Illinois Pollution Control Board and to civil court, the residents have also sent a signed petition directly to Alloy’s largest customer, General Motors, in order to inform the company of the damages they’ve suffered. “Considering the number of houses in the area, 344 signatures is a great response,” says Dana Ehrhart, one of many residents who hope to set up a dialogue with GM aimed at cleaning up Alloy’s practices.
Still, many residents are skeptical that General Motors will take action against Alloy, given that GM has invested over $14,000,000 to restructure the plant and to pay down Alloy’s debt. As of late January 2002, the residents have not received a response from GM, and neither the Attorney General’s case nor the resident’s lawsuit has been resolved. Dana and his neighbors continue to wait patiently.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001