Scott Edwards’ contribution to the Public i of August
2004 V4#6 on the relevance of the 2004 American presidential
election for the humanitarian crises in postcolonial
Sudan raises the need to, once again, expose the ahistorical
assumptions underlying a persistent American creed for
intervening in Third World countries.
To be clear, my aim is not to detract but indeed contribute
to the urgent need for American subjects and citizens
to negotiate a mutually acceptable image of imperial
America. To this end, I am concerned with the way in
which an ahistorical image of the Third World is once
again creeping back into the debate on imperial America’s
national purpose and the liberal left’s self-assumed global
mission to save an assumed undemocratic Third World.
To simplify, the arti cle is prem i s ed on the libera l
assumption that while Americans are not the global cop on
an imperial beat, as the neo-conservatives would have it,
they must unite to resume their once glorious role as the
global humanitarians, social workers, peace brokers and
rescue heroes for the sake of saving a genocidal Sudan.
With the retreat of the post 9-11 “they hate our freedoms”
rhetoric of the freedom-loving and war-mongering neoconservatives,
it seems that the liberal self-representation
of i m perial Am erica as the harbi n ger of econ om i c
progress, democracy and human uplift is in ascendance.
To be brief, my point is that from the situated perspective
of an Africanist long subjected and opposed to first
European colonial and nowAmerican imperial power, it is
not the purpose of Third World countries to mirror and
help solve the ‘identity’ and sociopolitical problems of a
polarizing, post cold-war and post 9-11 imperial America
– be they democracy-loving and guilt-driven neo-liberals
or freedom-loving and war-mongering neo-conservatives.
The oppressed and exploited people of the Third World
need neither neo-liberal nor neo-conservative missionaries.
Instead, given imperial America’s long and complex
political, economic and cultural involvement in the underdevelopment
of the Third World, especially after WW2, it
is probably more urgent to reflect on what imperial America
should not do in the Third World. To be sure, while I
am not certain what imperial America can do for the Third
World, I am convinced by historical evidence that there are
a number of things imperial America has been doing to
ThirdWorld countries that it should stop doing. Indeed, a
recent historical precedent for this proposition, clearly
worth reemphasizing, was the seismic shift in domestic
reappraisals of America’s missionary self-image as the vanguard
of modernit y after its disastrous 1960s invasion of
Vietnam and Indochina policy. In this turbulent phase, a
range of subordinate social and cultural counter-movements
cogently exposed the hidden side of imperial America
as grounded in the violence of racism, sexism, ecocide
and genocide and dehumanizing in its basic values. However,
as Edwards’s essay demonstrates, it is not yet safe to
assume that the old optimism and self-confidence of
republican America’s founding creed and sense of global
mission has been disturbed even among a college-educated
u pper- m i d dl e – cl a s s . Nevert h el e s s , as evi den ced by the
strenuous resistance of a re-conquered Iraqi people, imperial
America’s continuously shifting sense of a global mission,
even under the banner of humanitarian relief and liberal
democracy, is not uncontested in the Third World.
So how does America matter for the ThirdWorld? To be
clear, American experience is very important to the development
of Third World societies. However, its salience is
not as a liberal lead to follow. Instead, its lessons are best
illustrated when considered as the most modernized historical
theatre in which the social-political upheavals and
contradictions wrought by a neo-liberal capitalist trajectory
to modernity has developed furthest. More directly, it’s
the territory where the social, cultural, political and economic
costs and benefits of a colonial and now imperial
capitalist transformation to modernity are most visible, to
be either embraced, avoided or rejected.
So, by way of a conclusion, the American experience is
most significant to the Third World when Americans, as a
poly-vocal and asymmetric nation of conquered native
peoples, freed slaves, migrant workers and immigrant settler-
citizens work out for themselves their many different
and often contradictory self-perceptions without the need
for a rhetoric of transatlantic rescue missions to postcolonial
African countries, often the products of imperial
America’s foreign policy.
kensalo@uiuc.edu
Third World legal scholar at UIUC
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001