In the first two debates, President Bush delivered at
least five versions of the following argument about the
Iraq War:
BUSH: I don’t see how you can lead this country to
succeed in Iraq if you say wrong war, wrong time, wrong
place. What message does that send our troops? What
message does that send to our allies? What message does
that send the Iraqis?
Post-debate spin made much of Bush’s clumsy repetition
of the phrase, “wrong war, wrong time, wrong
place.” But I am interested in a different feature of this
argument. I submit that this argument illustrates in perfect
microcosm Bush’s political philosophy, one that
treats criticism as the primary threat to success.
We may classify this argument as an e n t h y m e m e,
defined by Aristotle as an argument with a missing
premise to be filled in by the audience with its own
knowledge or beliefs. For example, if I said, “Susan is a
great teacher; her classes always fill up
first,” the audience would fill in the
missing premise that “the classes of
great teachers tend to fill first.” For A r i stotle,
the enthymeme was the most powerful
form of persuasion because it is
grounded in the beliefs of the audience.
H o w e v e r, it is also a risky form of persuasion
because the speaker is always gambling that the
audience will “fill in the blank” with the “right answer. ”
Let’s see how the enthymeme works in a composite
version of Bush’s arguments about Kerry’s criticism of
the war:
PREMISE 1: John Kerry has criticized decision-making
about the war.
PREMISE 2 (MISSING – ASSUMED/FILLED IN
BYAUDIENCE): People who criticize decision-making
about war can’t be successful at conducting war.
CONCLUSION: John Kerry can’t lead us to success
in Iraq.
This argument is only successful for Bush if audience
members share Bush’s belief that criticism is a pervasive
threat to the higher values of “consistency,” “certainty,”
and “success.” But such a belief is not necessarily selfevident
in an American political system that was in fact
founded on the opposite view: criticism is vital to a
healthy democracy.
The fear of criticism has been a central focus of the
administration’s re-election campaign, as illustrated by
the risky enthymeme Bush sets forth (The Onion
acknowledged this when it recently announced on its
front page that the Bush administration had declared a
“War on Criticism”). For Bush, criticism creates uncert
a i n t y, uncertainty creates weakness, and weakness
wreaks havoc. Here are Bush’s own words from his closing
remarks at the Sept. 30 debate: “If America shows
uncertainty or weakness in this decade, the world will
drift toward tragedy. That’s not going to happen, so long
as I’m your president.”
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001