In what can only be characterized as arrogance
and impunity, we are learning that
Coca-Cola and Pepsi have continued to sell
soft drinks in India with dangerously high
levels of pesticides—three years after even
the government of India confirmed that
these products were dangerous.
Perhaps the cola companies know something
that we do not? Are Indians immune
to high levels of pesticides? How long will it
take before the powers that be in India
refuse to allow multinationals to treat Indians
as guinea pigs?
It is time for the cola companies to provide
details of the studies they must have
conducted to convince themselves that the
average Indian can consume pesticides
safely at levels 24 times the average American
and European. It is difficult to fathom
the business logic of a company that boasts
of having one global standard, yet three
years after being rapped by the Indian government,
continues to sell products in India
without making any improvements.
The pesticides in soft drinks in India is a
classic case of double standards, one for
Americans and Europeans, and another for
Indians. Coca-Cola products made in India
could never be sold in the European Union
markets or the United States. On at least 10
occasions since January 2005, the US Food
and Drug Administration has rejected the
shipment of Coca-Cola products made in
India coming into the US, on the grounds
that they do not conform to US laws and
that they are unsafe for the US public.
Both the cola companies’ excuse that
they have met the (non-existent) norms for
soft drinks in India falls flat in its face. In
this day and age of globalization, standards
are also globalized. The onus is upon the
global companies to provide a product that
is safe for consumers. Period. If a product
is unsafe for Americans, it is also unsafe for
Indians. It is the responsibility of Coca-
Cola and Pepsi to clean out the contaminants
from the raw materials before bringing
it to market.
It is indeed ironic that on the one hand,
these very companies argue for global rules
for trade and corporate investment, but
when challenged for their misdeeds, try to
invoke local and national laws. Unfortunately,
the cola companies’ transgressions
run much deeper in India, both figuratively
and literally.
In various parties of India, from Plachimada
in south India to Mehdiganj in north
India, communities living around Coca-Cola
bottling plants are experiencing severe water
shortages. The communities accuse the
Coca-Cola company of creating water shortages
because of over extraction of water and
pollution of the scarce remaining water.
And the communities have the numbers
to back it up. Tests conducted by the Central
Pollution Control Board, for example,
found excessive levels of lead and cadmium
in all of the Coca-Cola waste it surveyed in
bottling plants across the country, leading
the CPCB to order the Coca-Cola company
to treat its waste as hazardous waste. Prior
to the CPCB study, the Coca-Cola company
was distributing its toxic waste to farmers
around its bottling plants, as fertilizer! Test
results released just two weeks ago have
confirmed that the water is also polluted,
making it unfit for human consumption.
In Plachimada, Kerala, one of Coca-
Cola’s largest bottling plants has been shut
down since March 2004 because of the
intense community opposition to the plant.
The Kerala State Pollution Control Board
has also issued a stop order notice to the
company’s bottling plant because of the
pollution by the plant.
In a highly irresponsible practice, the
Coca-Cola company has located many of its
bottling plants in India in “drought prone”
areas, areas that were already experiencing
severe water crisis. In Rajasthan, for example,
a study by the Central Ground Water
Board found that water tables had dropped
10 meters in just five years since Coca-Cola
began its bottling operations in Kala Dera.
As with the pesticide issue, the Coca-
Cola company has challenged every study
that has been produced implicating it for
its wrongdoings. The company has also
hired a high-priced lobbyist in New Delhi
whose job, according to the International
Herald Tribune, was to “ensure, among
other things, that every government or private
study accusing the company of environmental
harm was challenged by another
study.”
The entire life-cycle of Coca-Cola—from
the extraction of water to the delivery of the
pesticide laden product- is wrought with
problems. In India, Coca-Cola uses the slogan
in Hindi—”Life ho toh aisi”—Life
should be like this. We don’t think so.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001