The nature of the daily interaction
between local police and minority youth
has become a topic of great discussion in
our community. The recent police shooting
of Kiwane Carrington and the charging
of the other 15 year-old involved have
highlighted the tensions and distrust that
many in the black community have of
local policing practices. The handling of
the incident by the State’s Attorney’s office
has also raised the related question of
whether the criminal justice system itself
can be fair and impartial to minority
youth. In short, people are asking, “is
there a racial disparity in policing practices
and the dispensing of juvenile justice
in Champaign County?”
To partially address that question,
Champaign Citizens for Peace and Justice
(CUCPJ) requested through the Freedom of
Information Act documents from the State’s
Attorney’s Office detailing all juvenile cases
filed in Champaign County since January
2008. Before examining this information, a
couple of demographic facts must be established.
According to 2008 U.S. Census figures,
Champaign County’s juvenile population
(persons under 18) was 38,533.
Approximately 30,000 or 78% were white,
4400 or 11.5% were black, and 4000 or
10% were Asian and other. This background
serves as a critical lens when reviewing
the number of charges and types of
juvenile cases filed in Champaign County.
There were a total of 525 juvenile cases
filed between January 2008 and October
2009, a 22 month period of time. That’s
one case for every 73 young people in
Champaign County. But when broken
down by race, 384 or 73% involved
blacks, 106 or 20% involved whites, and
35 or 7% involved “others.” When viewed
in relationship to each race’s proportion
of the population, the disparity is glaring.
During this period 3.5 of every 1000
white youth faced a criminal charge in
Champaign County while 86.7 of every
1000 black youth did. Black youth are
24.8 times more likely to be involved
with the police and charged with a criminal
act than white youth.
Is the behavior of black youth 24.8 times
more criminal than white youth? While
everyone recognizes the serious educational,
social and economic problems faced by
black youth, do these alone explain this
huge discrepancy? Or, could black youth be
experiencing a different type of interaction
with police, a situation where police may be
profiling black youth or exercising more
aggressive policing practices than toward
white youth? Is there an unwritten zero-tolerance
directive by the police department in
effect in the black community?
An example of this practice might be
seen when looking at “resisting arrest
and/or obstructing justice” charges filed by
the State’s Attorney. There were 24 cases in
all, 22 or 92% of them involved black
youth and no white youth were identified
with any case. Does it seem reasonable that
only black youth resist arrest or obstruct
justice? How is this discrepancy to be
explained, other than by acknowledging
that race is an unspoken factor in police
interactions?
Once young people enter the juvenile
justice system, how are their cases generally
disposed? Reviewing conviction rates
provides a helpful insight.
Again, during these twenty-two months
(1/08–10/09), of 525 juvenile cases filed 344
had been “disposed,” i.e., a decision rendered.
There were 95 misdemeanor and 60
felony convictions. The remaining 189 cases
were either plea bargained or simply dismissed.
Broken down further by race, 48.8%
or 120 of the disposed black cases ended in a
felony or misdemeanor conviction, while
36.6% or 26 of the disposed white cases
ended with such a conviction. In other
words, the conviction rate was 12.2 percentage
points higher for black youth than white
youth. One would assume in a fair and
impartial justice system these conviction
rates would be very similar. But they are not!
So, what accounts for black youth receiving a
significantly higher percentage of convictions
than white youth? If not race, what?
Even this cursory review of recent juvenile
statistics highlights serious and huge
disparities between black and white youth in
Champaign County. Clearly, more comprehensive
and detailed information is needed
on this subject. However, these limited statistics
do provide a glimpse of a major local
problem, a situation where black and white
youth have qualitatively different interactions
and experiences with the police and
juvenile criminal justice system. Until the
community admits and addresses these differences,
these inequities in juvenile justice
for minority youth will persist.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001