STOP TASING OUR BLACK CHILDREN IN KANKAKEE Junior High School.”
This is the message being sent by eight parents of eight junior high students,
aged 12–14, in four multi-million lawsuits in the U.S. Federal
District Court, Central District of Illinois–Urbana Division, on January
14, January 20, and February 11, 2010. These parents —Alta Young,
Stella Bender, Timothy Stone, Rhonda Bledsoe, Pearl Dossett, Angell
Leggett, Sakenya Love, and Paulette Calhoun-are alleging that their
children were tased in Kankakee Junior High School by the white School Resource Officer
and member of the Kankakee Police Department, Lonnie Netzel “without cause or
justification.”
These four lawsuits have been filed in Federal and not State Courts due to the charge
of Denial of Equal Protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The eight parents allege that tasings by the Caucasion police officer only take place
against “African-American students,” or in one suit, “against minorities.” They also allege
that this is a pattern involving many more students, also African-American, and reaching
back into 2008. The specific litigated events took place between October, 2009 and January,
2010.
The City of Kankakee (Police Department) and the Kankakee School District, both
defendants in these cases, have characterized these incidents as involving, “unauthorized
demonstrations” for which the various children “volunteered.” These two phrases are
apparently attempts to detach responsibility from those charged. One incident described
asserts that Officer Netzel placed a newspaper on the classroom floor before ordering a
minor child to lay down on his stomach to be tasered on his buttocks; however, the student
got up before being tased and managed to “un-volunteer.” The general understanding
of the children was that the newspaper was placed on the floor in the event the child
defecated or urinated as a result of the tasering. There is no claim on the part of the
defendants that tasers were being used as punishment.
The first charge in all of the suits is “excessive force” in that the children were assaulted
by Officer Netzel “without cause, justification, reason or provocation.” This is a charge
that these acts violate due process under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
These events, (characterized as tasings not as stun gun or barbs, despite blood at the site
and “wounds” indicating that some were with barbs), took place in the cafeteria, the hallway,
the office of the Principal and in classrooms, in most cases in the presence of another
adult in authority. These individuals —Jason Worden, the Principal and four classroom
teachers —J. Labon, T. Lareau, Bradley Netzel, and K. Flanigan—are charged with State
counts of “Wanton and Willful disregard for the safety and rights of minors” when in loco
parentis (acting in place of parents), and with violation of the Abused and Neglected Children
Reporting Act, for failure to report these incidents. Indeed, one parent observes that
his son did not tell him at first because he believed that tasing was acceptable since a law
enforcement officer and his teacher condoned it. The parents claim that the taser use
upon their children was a “form of intimidation used to scare or threaten Kankakee
Junior High School students into behaving, although in these instances it was used
absent any bad behavior.”
An additional charge in three of the four lawsuits is, “Intentional Infliction of Emotional
Distress. “ Many of the children suffered PTSD-type symptoms including sleeplessness,
physical distress, social aversion, nightmares, fears and anxiety, especially around
returning to school. One of the twelve-year-olds is bi-polar and ADHD, and his symptoms
became aggravated as a result of the tasing.
Defendants in all of the suits are the Board of Education of Kankakee School District
111 the City of Kankakee as the municipal corporation responsible for the Kankakee
Police Department, and the individual School Resource Officer, Lonnie Netzel. The suits
allege the failure of the City of Kankakee to provide any training to the majority of its officers
regarding the proper use of taser guns, thereby leading the police officers to believe
that their actions would never be scrutinized. It is fairly common in municipal Use of
Force policies and taser training manuals to exclude the use of tasers on “children.” Low
body weight is actually a risk factor in receiving electrical shock; so are heart conditions
and one of the minors had a pre-existing heart murmur.
All of the plaintiffs are represented by the The Law Firm of Rowe & Associates. Rowe’s
website bears the motto, “We don’t like to write polite letters. We don’t like to plea bargain.
We don’t like to settle for crumbs. But we do like to fight.” James R. Rowe is handling
two other (non-federal) lawsuits against the County Sheriff’s department for tasing
prisoners for prolonged periods of time while they were strapped on tables. Rowe stated
that the purpose of the lawsuit is to get the behavior and training of Kankakee police officers
to change. There is no clear law in Illinois concerning taser use. But the recent (Dec.
28, 2009) landmark decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit creates
new opportunities for court cases and an impetus for new legislation. This ruling states
that individual police officers could be held liable for using a taser without “proper
cause.” Proper cause was ruled as follows: “The objective facts must indicate that the suspect
poses an immediate threat to the officer or the immediate public.” This ruling significantly
changes the “liability landscape” on tasers in the U.S. These four lawsuits may
take as long as two years to come to trial.
The parents of Kankakee have not had success yet in stopping the use of tasers on
school children. The States Attorney of Kankakee County, Jamie Boyd, has repeatedly
refused pleas to investigate parents’ complaints. The NAACP of Kankakee is pressing to
get tasers out of the schools. There is a hotline for anyone with information on police
brutality and/or use of tasers in Kankakee County. (815) 361-7420.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001