Can money be wasted in a global sense?
No, not like fuel is wasted. Money is neither
a natural resource nor a manufactured
product. There are no resource
limits, though there are social limits to
its quantity, and there are essentially no
costs to its creation and destruction. It takes the same
amount of resources and effort to issue a million dollars as
just one dollar. Money is all about power and promises,
about relations between human beings.
Of course, in an individual sense, you can “waste money”
by spending it to no good purpose, or by failing to achieve
your purpose when you spend it; but this is careless
speech—actually you are wasting only your opportunity,
your access to money, not the money itself. Say, for example,
you spend money on tuition to take the class I teach, and all
you learn is nonsense. You don’t feel good about your
expenditure, you feel you “wasted your money”—but lo!
There the money is, safe now in my pocket, ready to be
spent again. Therefore, as an environmentalist in a global
sense (as money is part of the environment), you should not
think of the money you paid for my teaching as wasted,
even though you learned nothing. Suppose I take that
money you paid me and pay someone else to teach me—
and also learn nothing. The waters continue to flow as clean
as before, the songbirds seem most unconcerned, and the
money sits safely now in yet another’s pocket. Only when
instead I buy the fuel I need to get to class, to teach perhaps
another load of nonsense—only then should you be concerned.
For in your view at least, that fuel is indeed wasted!
Burned, it is no longer available to anyone, and the fumes
pollute the air and water, and in your view, to no good purpose.
Once again, however, only the fuel is wasted, not the
money, which now safely sits in the fuel dealer’s pocket.
Let’s examine this more closely. You think the burned
fuel is wasted because you get nothing from my teaching,
and you are quite right! But I don’t agree, because I do get
something from my teaching—your money. More money
indeed than I need to pay for fuel to get to class, so for me
the whole enterprise is a valid business plan; in fact, who
knows, I might even get a bank loan against my car on the
strength of it, in case I have to buy fuel before you pay me;
so apparently the bank doesn’t agree with you either.
WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT THIS
DISAGREEMENT?
There is a market solution: you stop paying me, and then
my business plan collapses: no income, no bank loan, no
teaching, no fuel burned. This actually works if it gets me to
improve my teaching or do something else useful. Say that I
improve my teaching, can now teach you and thirty others
how to save fuel, and in the end, my teaching reduces students’
fuel consumption a greater amount than I burn to get
to class. This is what markets are supposed to accomplish:
you are happy about how you spent your money, I am
happy to earn it, and globally we end up with more
resources than we used in the enterprise. How marvelous!
What happens if the market solution doesn’t lead to such
a happy outcome? Perhaps I cannot improve my teaching;
perhaps I’m also a bit short on technical and social skills and
fail to retrain or find another line of work. In this case, the
graceful, environmental and social thing for me to do seems
to be to get out of the way—to commit suicide. This is the
ultimate, inescapable logic of those to whom private markets
are sacred and other institutions profane. For all but these,
however, there are also non-market solutions available.
Non-market solutions are less efficient, at least in theory,
but they can be more efficient than an existing status
quo (and certainly more palatable to me)! For example,
suppose you pay me to teach where I live instead of driving
to my old class: no more burning fuel. You don’t miss
me in class; for all you care I don’t have to teach at all, it
was nonsense anyhow; and while you are still wasting
your opportunity, and your access to money, (remember
you are not wasting the money itself—I’ll have it), at least
now no fuel is burned. OK, things are already better than
before; the water remains clean and the songbirds unconcerned.
A problem, though: why should you be the one
stuck with paying me? What about others? Here is one
reason we have taxes and “big government,” to spread the
responsibility of paying people to do nothing.
That is right: nothing, or at any rate, less, that is how
we save resources and reduce pollution without culling the
ranks of unproductive humanity. In our example, we prevent
needless fuel consumption. And remember, since I’ve
stopped teaching in another town, you’ll not only somehow
have to take care of me, but also the fuel vendor who,
however competent, has lost my business.
If you’ve read this far, you surely are wondering—are
these really the only choices? To pay me to teach badly or
pay me not to teach at all; to pay the fuel vendor either to
sell or not to sell fuel? Of course you are right to wonder.
To be sure, the amount paid need not be the same in either
case, so both the fuel vendor and I could have some financial
incentive to do our work well instead of not at all in
order to keep our jobs. Still we are left with the basic issue.
What about the happy possibility we discussed before,
the celebrated “market solution”, whereby we either do our
jobs better or switch to other jobs and end up making ourselves
both useful to other people and protective of nature?
Once again, that is always a possibility, but there is certainly
no guarantee. The main difference between the view presented
in this article and the economic analyses you are
likely to read elsewhere is simply this: less optimism about
the power of market allocation, however rational, and of
incentives, however strong, to make all—or even most—of
us worth a decent living; less optimism about the ability of
market forces to guide us all into useful activities consistent
with responsible stewardship of our resources and environment.
We need non-market interventions to keep masses of
people, unproductive for one reason or another, from
wrecking the environment and using up resources in a
futile struggle to survive. Let’s help ourselves and each
other survive in a manner less wasteful of resources, and
remember, as long as we share the cost burden in an
acceptable manner, there is no reason whatever to worry,
on a global level, that money itself is ever “wasted.”
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- December 2024
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001