The Campaign to End the Death Penalty (CEDP) is
appalled by the news that several individuals of leading
anti-death penalty organizations have signed a confidential
memorandum stating that the “involvement of Mumia
Abu-Jamal endangers the U.S. coalition for abolition of the
death penalty.” The memo further argues that the World
Coalition Against the Death Penalty should not highlight
Mumia’s case because doing so “unnecessarily attracts our
strongest opponents and alienates coalition partners at a
time when we need to build alliances, not foster hatred
and enmity.” (www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/117)
This memo was drafted on December 21, 2009, yet it
only recently came to light following the 4th World Congress
Against the Death Penalty, held on March 4 in Geneva,
Switzerland. At this meeting, a telephone call came in
from Mumia Abu-Jamal, and he addressed the audience.
At this point, several members of U.S. abolitionist groups
got up and walked out in protest.
The Campaign to End the Death Penalty strongly condemns
this action and completely disagrees with the approach
to the anti-death penalty struggle that this memo puts forth.
First of all, we unequivocally support and endorse
Mumia Abu-Jamal in his struggle for justice. We believe in
his innocence and see Mumia’s case as fraught with many
of the same injustices as other death penalty cases–racial
bias, police misconduct and brutality, and prosecutorial
and judicial prejudice.
Mumia Abu-Jamal has been on Pennsylvania’s death row
for the past 28 years and remains there because the courts,
under pressure from the Fraternal Order of Police, have
thwarted his efforts to win his freedom. From his prison
cell, Mumia has galvanized an international movement of
support towards his efforts to win justice. He has written
numerous books and articles shedding light on our prisonindustrial
complex as well as other historical and current
political issues. He is widely read, known and respected. His
commentaries on prison radio are nothing short of brilliant.
He has helped to educate millions of people about the true
workings of the criminal justice system. But most importantly,
he has been an inspiration to all those fighting to win
abolition, lending his voice of hope, his encouragement and
his unfaltering determination to our movement.
So why would a delegation of U.S. abolitionists would
get up and walk out of a meeting when Mumia addresses
the audience? Shouldn’t they have stood and applauded?
The explanation for this reprehensible action is
explained in the secret memo, which basically puts forth the
argument that to have anything to do with Mumia’s case
ruins the chances of winning abolition of the death penalty.
Why? Here is what the memo states, in part: “The support
of law enforcement officials is essential to achieving abolition
in the United States. It is essential to the national abolition
strategy of U.S. abolition activists and attorneys that we cultivate
the voices of police, prosecutors and law enforcement
experts to support our call for an end to the death penalty.”
This statement points to a very disturbing direction that
we have observed in recent years among some organizations
in the abolition movement–of compromising our
message in order to win the support of conservatives. This
has lead leading death penalty organizations to downplay
the impact of race in the criminal justice system and to
advocate reaching out to law enforcement as a means of
winning abolition of the death penalty.
Those who espouse this strategy ignore or downplay the
role that police play in railroading many poor people and
African Americans onto death row. They ignore the role
that police, prosecutors and judges play as guardians of an
unjust legal system that disproportionately targets the poor
and people of color. The outcome of this strategy has led to
the marginalization of prisoners like Mumia, whose voices
from behind prison walls are so important in this fight.
The individuals who drafted the memo go on to identify
the voices that they seek to include: “The voices of the
Innocent, the voices of Victims and the voices of Law
Enforcement are the most persuasive factors in changing
public opinion and the views of decision-makers (politicians)
and opinion leaders (the media). Continuing to
shine a spotlight on Abu-Jamal, who has had so much
public exposure for so many years, threatens to alienate
these three most important partnership groups.”
We in the CEDP couldn’t disagree more with this strategy.
We believe the most “persuasive factor” in changing
public opinion is to build a vocal, visible movement that
forthrightly puts forward its demands– instead of working
to make our message palatable to the opposition.
Consider the analogies to past struggles. What if Martin
Luther King compromised the goals of integration in order
to reach out and try to win over segregationists? No, he
reached out to organize and uplift progressive forces into
fighting for change. That is the kind of strategy we need.
The men and women on death row across the country-
-including the guilty–are not our enemy. The enemy is the
system of punitive thought that portrays them as monsters
so that the public can feel okay about killing them. It is
part of the punitive philosophy upon which the legal system
is based–the same system that breeds crime in the
first place, that gives so little support to victims of abuse,
that says it believes in rehabilitation but then won’t fund it,
that says it believes in education but then takes money
away to build prisons instead.
We reject the logic of having the Fraternal Order of
Police as a partner or ally. The FOP has organized against
our efforts to win justice for Mumia, for Troy Davis, for the
Burge Torture victims in Chicago and countless others.
Our approach is based on an anti-racist perspective. We
know that the history of aggressive policing, sentencing
and the death penalty has its roots in slavery–that the
tough on crime rhetoric of lock-em-up-and-throw-awaythe-
key is racially coded language.
The Campaign stands completely and unequivocally
with Mumia Abu-Jamal. We also stand by a different strategy
to win abolition.
Instead of marginalizing voices like Mumia, we should be
developing more innovative and creative ways to put them
forward–and not just Mumia’s, but others, including Troy
Davis, Rodney Reed and Kevin Cooper, to name a few. We
need to put the human face on this issue. We need to build a
movement that challenges the racism and class bias nature of
the death penalty–and to point out that these injustices exist
in the broader criminal justice system as well.
In order to build a fight that can win real justice, we cannot
marginalize “divisive” issues like racism. Instead, we have
to take them on frontally. And instead of reaching out to the
conservative elements in society, we should be reaching out to
progressive elements and building bridges there. Let’s not forget
that the lowest level of support for the death penalty (42
percent) was in 1966, at the height of the civil rights movement.
Let’s work to place the fight for abolition squarely in the
progressive camp, where it most surely belongs.
Please visit: www.nodeathpenalty.org
FREE MUMIA! ONWARDS TO ABOLITION!
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- December 2024
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001