FEW PRISONERS WOULD BE SHOCKED to learn that they are paying
too much for items sold in prison commissaries or canteens.
The Illinois Dept. of Corrections (IDOC), however,
has taken commissary price-gouging to an extreme level.
In order to generate more revenue to help fund an overcapacity
prison system, the Illinois General Assembly
passed Senate Bill 0629 in 2004. The bill, which became
Public Act 93-0607, granted the IDOC authority to add up
to a 25% surcharge on all non-tobacco products and up to
35% on all tobacco products sold at prison commissaries.
Prior to this amendment the surcharge was capped at 10%.
Illinois prisoners groaned as commissary prices rose.
As captive consumers who rely on meager prison wages,
the price increase meant a drastic reduction in what they
were able to purchase.
Ironically, it wasn’t prisoners who cried the loudest
about the price increase but rather prison guards. Their
union, the American Federation of State, County and
Municipal Employees (AFSCME), was able to convince
state lawmakers to sponsor a bill to exempt IDOC employees
from most of the price increase by capping commissary
surcharges at 10% for prison staff. The bill passed and
became Public Act 94-0913, effective June 23, 2006.
Beginning November 1, 2005, the IDOC began imposing
an additional surcharge of 3% on commissary items
beyond the statutorily-permitted 25% and 35% mark-ups.
Two months later the IDOC increased the additional surcharge
to 7%.
Those may seem like small amounts, but consider
there are around 45,000 IDOC prisoners who purchase
commissary items on a regular basis. In a July 20, 2009
report, the Illinois Auditor General concluded that the
IDOC had received additional revenue from the 3%-7%
surcharges in the amounts of $1,266,911 for fiscal year
2006, $2,259,760 in fiscal year 2007, and $2,339,244 in
fiscal year 2008. Thus, over that three-year period, the
IDOC reaped $5.8 million from the additional commissary
mark-ups.
The unlawful nature of the 3%–7% surcharges was first
pointed out to the IDOC by the Auditor General’s Office in
a 2007 report, which noted they were, “duplicative and
exceed the statutorily allowed mark-up.” The report recommended
that the IDOC, “revise its methodology” and
“comply with the statute and only mark-up goods for
resale in the inmate commissary to the allowable amounts.”
IDOC officials tried to justify their actions with a selfserving
interpretation of the statute (730 ILCS 5/3-7-2a),
which they claimed allowed, “additional charges” to pay
the wages and benefits of commissary employees. The
Auditor General recommended that the IDOC, “seek a formal
written Attorney General opinion on this matter.”
During an April 1, 2008 hearing before the Legislative
Audit Commission, then IDOC Director Roger E. Walker,
Jr. said the department would continue imposing the 7%
surcharge until it received a response from the Attorney
General’s office. However, when the Auditor General
asked for a copy of the IDOC’s letter requesting an opinion
from the Attorney General, the IDOC revealed that it had
never sought a formal opinion.
This was not the only devious tactic employed by the
IDOC. Instead of applying the 3%–7% surcharges to the
cost of commissary items sold, the IDOC was applying
the increase to the selling price of items after the authorized
25% and 35% mark-ups were added. Thus,
instead of a 3%–7% surcharge, prisoners were paying an
effective 9% increase.
The IDOC was largely unapologetic, despite having
bilked Illinois prisoners out of almost $6 million
between fiscal years 2006 and 2008. Prison officials stated
they would, “once again try to get permission to seek
an opinion from the Attorney General,” and optimistically
said there was, “every expectation permission will be
granted.” In the meantime, Illinois prisoners continue to
pay the legally-questionable 7% surcharge on prison
commissary sales.
Sources: Illinois Auditor General reports, www.ilga.gov
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001
Pingback: San Francisco Bay View » Illinois prisoners boycott overpriced phone calls, commissary and vending machines
Pingback: Prison Boycott in Illinois Targets Costs of Incarceration | News4Security