When my family moved to Peoria from Urbana
more than 8 years ago, we suffered some culture
shock. We’d left a fairly progressive community
and a wide circle of activist friends to move to a
city where the culture was much more conservative
and definitely more passive; the first
demonstration we saw covered on Peoria television
was a group of people rallying to get a
Hooter’s on the riverfront. But where Urbana’s
physical charms are subtle, Peoria’s geological
variety was a pleasant change.
That fall I would often find myself driving on
the western edge of town on a two-lane road that
descends from the neighborhoods in the hills lining
the Illinois River, toward the cornfields
beyond. The hills, the trees in their autumn colors,
the blue sky over the cornfields all helped compensate
a bit for what we’d left behind. To w a r d
the bottomof the hill, an access road threads back
uphill, marked by a sign reading “Environmental
Management Services.” In my bucolic daze I
thought of recycling and other green things.
Who knew that the facility hidden at the end
of that access road, behind that ludicrously
euphemistic sign, was actually a hazardous
waste landfill? As it turns out, almost nobody.
Peoria Disposal Company’s No.1 landfill has
accepted millions of tons of hazardous waste at
this facility since the 1970s, and most Peorians
would have remained ignorant of this situation
had the landfill not approached capacity. With
closure looming within in a few years, Peoria
Disposal Company (PDC) began the process of
applying to expand the landfill by over 8 acres
and 45 vertical feet, which would allow dumping
to continue for another 15 years.
The first to raise the alarm, a year or more
ago, were groups like Heart of Illinois Sierra
Club and River Rescue. Still, the news didn’t
seem to travel much beyond those who were
already active in environmental efforts–a pretty
small community. But when PDC filed its application
in late 2005 and made the requisite public
notification (a tiny display ad in the Peoria
Journal Star), the cat was out of the bag and
public opposition quickly gathered momentum.
When people started asking questions about
what was being dumped on the edge of town,
what they learned literally frightened them into
action. Under its current permit, PDC No.1
accepts primarily waste containing heavy metals
like lead, mercury, cadmium and chromium. It
also accepts Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP)
remediation wastes: soil removed from the former
sites of plants that produced fuel gas from
coal. A partial list of the
toxic materials often
found in these soils
includes volatile and
semivolatile org a n i c
compounds (VOCs and
SVOCs), benzene,
polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PA H s ) ,
and metals like arsenic,
chromium, lead, copper,
nickel and zinc. PDC is
licensed to accept some
wastes that it currently
does not (such as PCBs);
PDC alone decides what waste to accept. The
substances being dumped at PDC No.1 have
been associated with cancer, birth defects, and
mental retardation, to name just a few of the
possible health hazards.
H o w e v e r, this site has been operating since at
least the 1970s, well before current regulations
were put into place. It’s not entirely clear what
might be buried in the older parts of the landfill.
Of particular concern is the “barrel trench,”
where in the 1970s steel drums containing various
solid and liquid hazardous materials were
buried with only a non-compacted clay “liner”.
In 1983, an EPA report noted “contaminants
found puddled on soil from leaking drums.”
While there are enough concerns about this
landfill to fill a day-long seminar, possibly the
most serious and obvious problem – and one relevant
to Urbana-Champaign residents – is that it
sits on top of the Sankoty Aquifer. Landfill
defenders have made a great deal of noise about
the fact that the landfill sits above the Shelbyville
Outwash, not the Sankoty itself. The
Shelbyville Outwash is a finger, if you will, on
the hand of the Sankoty Aquifer. PDC No.1 sits
right at the knuckle where they join–upstream.
To suggest that the landfill does not endanger
the Sankoty is a bit like saying if we dump
something into the Mississippi at New Orleans,
it won’t get into the Gulf.
The Sankoty Aquifer underlies 750 square
miles of Illinois. It furnishes drinking water to
264,000 people in 39 communities in the tricounty
area alone (Peoria,
Tazewell, and Wo o d f o r d
counties). But the Sankoty
is not a discrete entity. It is
hydraulically connected,
and mixes water, with the
Mahomet A q u i f e r.
Urbana-Champaign draws
water from the Mahomet.
PDC claims that we
don’t have to worry about
groundwater contamination
because the liner system
will last for 500
years. Even if that were
true, heavy metals last forever–they do not
degrade–and I daresay they will be as poisonous
to people in 2506 as they are now. The truth is,
all landfills leak. Liner systems consist of compacted
clay (which is permeable) and
HDPE–plastic–sheeting. The plastic sheeting is
permeable even when intact; liners have pinholes
in them when they are installed; and they
all degrade and crack eventually. Landfills a lot
younger than 500 years are already leaking. In
fact, evidence suggests that PDC No.1 is already
leaking. PDC’s assurances regarding their liner
system don’t hold water, let alone toxic waste.
There are other issues of concern to people
outside of Peoria County. Consider the fact that
only around 10% of the waste comes from Peoria
County. Most of it comes from out of state,
including Indiana and Ohio, and comes to Peoria
in trucks over the highways. One could reasonably
assume that hazardous materials are
being trucked down I-74 to Peoria, and spills
can happen anywhere.
As long as landfilling hazardous waste is
cheap and convenient, industry will continue to
produce it. Stopping the expansion of PDC No.1
will reduce the options available to producers of
toxic waste, making the development of alternative
processes more attractive. Clearly, the continued
operation of PDC’s hazardous waste
landfill endangers more than just Peoria residents;
stopping the expansion and closing the
landfill will benefit us all.
Thanks to a grassroots movement the likes of
which many longtime Peoria residents say they
have never seen – petition, yard sign and billboard
campaigns, door-to-door canvassing, letters
to the local paper and untold numbers of
phone calls, emails and old-fashioned letters to
County Board members organized by the local
Sierra Club, River Rescue, Citizens for our
Environment and Peoria Families Against Toxic
Waste – on May 3 the Peoria County Board
voted 12-6 to deny PDC’s expansion request.
We have cleared one major hurdle, but our
work has just begun. We now have to muster our
resources – physical, psychic, and financial – to
oppose PDC’s almost certain appeal of the
board’s decision to the Illinois Pollution Control
Board. In any case, millions of tons of hazardous
waste still sit above our aquifer, within 3
miles of 53,000 residents and directly upwind of
some of the most densely populated neighborhoods
in Peoria. Our task now is to do what is
necessary to protect not just our community but
others across central Illinois.
You may feel removed from this problem,
but truly we are all connected. The Illinois EPA
needs to know how far the effects of this decision
extend, and how great is the good – or the
harm – they have the opportunity to do. Please
contact Director Douglas P. Scott of the Illinois
EPA at PO Box 19276, Springfield, IL 62794 or
call 217/782-3397 and let him know that PDC
No. 1 needs to be cleaned up, not expanded.
Visit www.notoxicwaste.org to get the latest
information and find out how to help.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- December 2024
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001