It is beyond dispute that undocumented immigration disproportionately
impacts low-wage, mostly African American
workers. The debate ought to be about what the solution
is.
Certainly, black Americans should view with suspicion the
right wing’s newfound interest in their economic plight. If
Republicans cared about low-wage black workers, they
would have supported the proposed minimum wage hike,
living wage protocols across the country and health care
reform, all of which disproportionately impact poor blacks.
So, we know their motives are suspect. They are simply
exploiting the plight of black workers to advance an antiimmigrant
agenda.
The fact is, what conservatives are prescribing as a solution
will exacerbate, rather than ameliorate, the job crisis in the
black community. Their insistence on punitive measures to
further isolate and marginalize immigrants will guarantee a
permanent reservoir of exploitable labor for employers.
Undocumented immigrants with no rights cannot exercise
basic workplace rights, such as joining a union. That is exactly
what employers want. It is that vulnerability that puts
downward pressure on wages and hurts native-born workers.
If we agree that it is not feasible to deport 12 million
undocumented people, then we must ask what is the best
solution? Our (the progressive) solution that calls for status
legalization will confer rights on undocumented immigrants,
and thus deny employers the cheap labor they
want. With their newfound rights, immigrant workers can
work with African American workers to build power in the
workplace, form or join unions, and fight for better wages
together. They can join other movements and organize
around a broader, far reaching political agenda that
includes national health care, global warming, school funding,
Iraq War, post-Bush civil rights restoration, and so on.
We need to force a public debate on these two alternative
visions of immigration reform. The marginalization
course sought by conservatives will ensure continued distress
for low-wage American workers, while the more
humane, morally compelling course advocated by progressives
promises to benefit both categories of workers, is consistent
with American constitutional tenets of “freedom and
equality for all” and imposes accountability on policy makers
who have supported NAFTA-style trade deals.
Indeed, policy makers should be put on the defensive
for these trade agreements. That NAFTA and CAFTA have
exacerbated undocumented immigration is no longer
debatable. Where is the accountability of politicians who
continue to push these trade deals, even as we speak? I
think we spend way too much time defending immigrants,
instead of attacking trade policy. The Democrats and
Republicans who gave us these trade agreements should be
put on trial, not their immigrant victims.
Finally, we should force Americans to reflect on what
America will look like with 12 million people existing on
the margins of politics and economy, devoid of all rights. Is
that an America people can be comfortable with? And what
about the “border wall” as a solution? Few believe it will
work and, in a post-Cold War era, it should be an insult to
those who always believed that free societies do not build
walls around themselves.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- December 2024
- October 2024
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001