MY FRIEND JULIE FALCO
lives in Chicago and is an
alum of Illinois State University,
where she graduated
in Communications
and played in a band
called New Position. She
was singing live on stage
in Bloomington-Normal when she suddenly
found herself unable to move her arm.
The whole left side of her body stiffened.
Her legs felt tight, and she became shaky
and weak. She wondered what was happening
to her as her bandmates carried her,
bewildered, off the stage.
After a series of hospitalizations and
inconclusive tests, Julie was finally told
that she had multiple sclerosis (MS), a disease
with no known cause or cure. That
was all she was told. Her doctor simply
gave her a book abut MS and told her to go
home and rest.
This happened in 1986, when she was 20
years old. Let me tell you about what her life
is like currently, 21 years later. It is as you
might imagine for an MS patient. She suffers
from severe pain, but she is able to live alone
and generally take care of herself. She sometimes
uses a wheelchair and sometimes
hunches over a walker, dragging each leg
with each step. In her words, each step is like
dragging through deep snow while hiking up
the side of a mountain. The mornings are the
worst for her because she wakes up with her
tightened legs in pain every day. But she manages
and, as anyone who knows her will tell
you, she is a fun, spunky, and generally
happy person to be around. She takes exactly
two medications and experiences very few
side effects, none of them especially intrusive.
Now let me tell you what her life was like
before she began eating cannabis brownies
regularly. She tried several pharmaceuticals,
and none of them provided the degree of relief
she currently experiences. For the harsh side
effects, doctors prescribed other pharmaceuticals
that produced further side effects. For
example, for drugs that caused depression as
a side effect, she was prescribed antidepressants,
which carried their own side effects, for
which she was prescribed more drugs. At one
point, she was trying more than thirty different
pharmaceuticals, each with their own side
effects. She would wake up with massive
headaches and flu-like symptoms every day
plus constipation, and these were side effects
on top of the MS symptoms. She became
severely depressed to the point of being
unable to wake up. The costs of the drugs
were not cheap. She could barely keep up
with the cycle of drugs treating side effects of
drugs treating other side effects of drugs that
were not helping with MS symptoms. Then
she read about cannabis as a treatment for
MS, and tried inhaling cannabis, which did
not lead to a great improvement. Then she
tried cannabis brownies, and experienced
such a rapid improvement that she has been
able to wean herself off all the pharmaceuticals
except an occasional
Tylenol-3.
At this point, there is very little
serious debate about whether
cannabis has medical value (if you
would like to learn more, do a
review of “cannabinoid” in medical
literature), but the legal status of
medical cannabis is a source of much
confusion. In the rest of this article,
I’d like to summarize the federal and
state-specific legal status of cannabis.
EXISTING LAW
At the federal level, medical
cannabis remains illegal. Period. At
the state level, however, twelve
states including Alaska, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana,
Nevada, Oregon, Rhode
Island, Vermont, and Washington,
have passed laws permitting the
medical use of cannabis. Even in
those states, patients are subject to
federal prosecution, according to
the Supreme Court’s decision in
Gonzalez v. Raich (2005). But
patients in those states enjoy varying
degrees of day-to-day legal protection
while they use their medicine.
CURRENT STATE LAW
Putting aside the states that explicitly allow
the medical use of cannabis with a doctor’s
recommendation, thirty-five states plus the
District of Colombia have passed legislation
that recognize cannabis’s medicinal value.
One of these states is—surprise—Illinois!
Section 11 of our own state’s Cannabis Control
Act, states that “the Illinois Department
of Health and Human Services, with written
approval by the Illinois State Police, may
authorize the use of cannabis for the ‘treatment
of glaucoma, the side effects of
chemotherapy or radiation therapy in cancer
patients or such other procedure certified
to be medically necessary”. [Source:
720 ILCS 550/11]
If you’re rubbing your eyes, re-reading
that, and wondering how we still have a
problem, you’re not alone. Why can’t this law
protect Julie and the 200,000 other patients
who could benefit from medical cannabis?
Why are they instead being harassed, intimidated,
and arrested when the law says they
may use cannabis? Why hasn’t anyone been
authorized by the IDHHS, per this section?
Maybe a public outcry would provide an
answer to these questions. We’re asking all
organizations, media, and citizens to contact
their legislators and ask them to enforce Section
11. As a prominent but anonymous
Champaign citizen said to me recently, if the
state can choose which parts of the Illinois
Cannabis Control Act it wants to enforce,
why can’t we choose which parts of the Act
we want to comply with?
RECENT ILLINOIS MEDICAL
CANNABIS BILLS
Meanwhile, there have been several recent
attempts to make Illinois the thirteenth
state to allow medical use of cannabis. In
fact, there have been three bills in the past
three years. A quick recap:
2005: Sen. John Cullerton (D-Chicago)
introduces H.B. 407, the Illinois Medical
Cannabis Act. After a no vote from the
Republicans on the committee and two
Democrats including Naomi Jakobsson, the
bill fails in the House Human Services Committee
with a vote of 6-5. (Sidenote: I met
with Ms. Jakobsson before the vote and presented
a Zogby poll showing that
approximately 70 percent of Champaign
County residents support medicinal
use of marijuana under the guidance
of a physician. She was very dismissive.)
2006: Sen. Cullerton again introduces
a medical cannabis bill, S.B.
2568. It passes the Illinois Senate
Health and Human Services committee
and is endorsed by the Chicago Sun-
Times and the Illinois Nurses Association.
However, the Senate fails to vote
on the bill by the session deadline.
2007: Sen. Cullerton introduces S.B.
650. After passing committee, the bill
fails narrowly by a vote of 22-29. Our
area’s state senator, Sen. Frerichs (D),
voted against the bill.
While it is disappointing that the
bill has failed despite the wide range of
credible endorsements and the heartfelt
testimony from patients like Julie
Falco, there is reason to be optimistic.
Through the hard work of groups and
individuals all over the state, support
for a medical cannabis bill has steadily
increased and there is reason to expect
the pattern to continue. Stay tuned in
2008 for another attempt. If you think
patients like Julie and the roughly 200,000
patients in Illinois with ailments like cancer,
AIDS, MS, and glaucoma deserve to use
their medicine in peace, call Rep. Jakobsson
and Sen. Frerichs and ask them why they
voted to send these patients to jail.
For more information on medical
cannabis in Illinois, please visit the local
health care advocacy group IDEAL (Illinois
Drug Education and Legislative) Reform at
www.idealreform.org.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001