BARGAINING IN AN ATMOSPHERE of fiscal crisis is difficult. There
is a temptation to maneuver conservatively, hoping only to
hold one‘s ground. However, for those of us who are graduate
employees, the current and future stewards of higher
education, the ground is shifting beneath us. The proliferation
of contingent instructors on college and university campuses
is already well entrenched. Contrary to the increasingly
fantastical picture of university faculty as securely tenured
and handsomely paid, contingent instructors have no job
security, work on a part-time or temporary basis, and are
almost always paid less than the permanent full-time faculty
who do the same work. Nationwide, roughly 70% of higher
education instructional units are taught by contingent
instructors: adjuncts, graduate employees, visiting faculty,
post-doctoral associates, or other employee designations that
are euphemisms for “more work for less pay.“
Calls on the part of graduate employees for equitable and
just pay and working conditions are often dismissed as naïve
and unrealistic. After all, the logic goes, graduate students are
like apprentices, working hard for little reward now in order to
achieve the security and prestige of a tenured faculty position
in the future. Yet these positions are increasingly rare, while
enrollment in graduate degree programs climbs steadily. The
inevitable result is a pool of qualified workers who, out of desperation,
compete for jobs as contingent instructors, the only
positions available for the vast majority of applicants.
At present, nationwide hiring freezes and budget cuts in
higher education are compounding this cycle. The jobs that
were scarce five years ago are simply non-existent this year.
At the same time, universities are taking graduate employees
unable to find work and rolling them directly into their own
pools of adjunct instructors, creating, in the extreme case, an
endless supply of overqualified, underpaid, contingent labor.
Is this the future of higher education? As universities,
including the University of Illinois, adopt a market-driven corporate
model, it is hard to see any alternative. As public universities
accept diminishing government funds, they come to
rely on tuition as the primary source of revenue, creating an
incentive system that puts profits over educational priorities.
Meanwhile, students bear the burden and debt of increasing
tuition because they believe they are investing in future
careers. For many, however, the reality is that, they again find
themselves holding credentials for jobs that have been converted
from stable careers to contingent positions, a phenomenon
made possible by a surplus of qualified workers and the
exploitative opportunities of neoliberal economic imperialism.
Though it is by no means the only solution, unionization
of students and workers is a crucial response to this worsening
economic outlook. Organized labor in higher education
provides an immediate mechanism to address the economic
needs of workers who are increasingly exploited. Moreover,
organized labor in higher education provides an urgently
needed rebuttal and democratic alternative to the shortsighted
corporate governance that leads to the proliferation
of contingent workers on campus, skyrocketing tuition, and
the privatization of public institutions of higher education.
The Graduate Employees’ Organization represents more
than 2,700 Teaching Assistants and Graduate Assistants at
the University of Illinois. The GEO negotiates contracts,
resolves grievances, and protects the rights of graduate
employees. The GEO also works in solidarity with other
unions and progressive organizations both at the University
and in the larger Champaign-Urbana community, toward
equality, dignity, and justice for working people of all occupations.
On Tuesday, April 21, the GEO met with the University‘s
bargaining team to begin negotiating a new contract.
Notwithstanding the University‘s claims that this is a time
for “belt-tightening,” the GEO contract proposal seeks simply
to protect the interests of some of the most exploited
workers on campus who face low incomes, enormous
obstacles to raising children, inadequate healthcare, and the
erosion of basic benefits that make it possible to pursue a
graduate degree in the first place.
An important component of the GEO contract proposal is
the provision of a living wage for all graduate employees.
Under the current graduate employee contract, the minimum
for a 9-month, 50% appointment is $13,430; this is the standard
appointment for most graduate employees and it is the
maximum appointment available to most international graduate
students. Meanwhile, the University itself publishes an
estimated annual cost of living of $16,086 (www.osfa.
uiuc.edu/cost/grad/nonres_0910.html.) Almost 60% of
teaching assistants at the University make less than this
amount, and 30% earn the minimum stipend, $2,656 less
than the University‘s own estimate of the annual cost of living.
None of those figures take into account the nearly $1,000
in fees that graduate employees must remunerate to the University
during the course of the academic year.
The current GEO contract expires on August 15,
2009. Negotiations are expected to continue throughout
the summer.
Get Connected
Search Public i
Public i
Get Connected
Archives
- July 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- June 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001